Good review of Caliban and the Witch by Karl Kersplebedeb.

I've not read the book, but I enjoyed this review. I like the idea of the Cambridge University Press debate series; I should browse the titles sometime.

I enjoyed this interview with Selma James (from 2012).

Emma Goldman is a featured article on Wikipedia

This is a reasonable middle-ground position.

I think this is a succinct summary and agreeable conclusion regarding the whole RadFem thing.

As I understand the "RadFem" position, it rejects gender (man/woman) as socially constructed and oppressive to those in the Woman role, but embraces sex (male/female) as real and seeks to create safe spaces for Females. Yet such a sex realism simply moves the gender essentialism, whereby gender is an inescapable consequence of "socialization" as informed by anatomy, to a further remove. Essentialism in sheep's clothing. The motivation behind the whole fruitless endeavor seems to be to exclude trans-women from female liberation movements.

RadFems hold that women who are male (by some ostensibly scientific standard, I guess, or by some less-than-scientific claims of "socialization") are members of an oppressive class. Which, on its face, is ridiculous in my view. Trans*-identifying people are one of the most marginalized and vulnerable segments of society, and any movement which considers them to be oppressive is highly suspect to me.